Ha! I was wondering about that.138 Scourge wrote:Huh. I totally meant to type "Nah" instead of "Bah" there. Minor thing, but changes the tone somewhat. Posting from my phone is weird.
Every Star Trek movie line from 1994 until then had been handled by Playmates, Playmates who 20 years later is still making bank with TMNT so they obviously know something about running a toy line. And Playmates released 4", 6", 12" figures, role-play product, and vehicle product, all of which failed. Mattel also released movie product in vehicles and in Barbie which failed. Even at deep clearance those products still struggled to move. New Coke Trek is not a toyetic film, and collectors didn't want a big part of it (partly due to the completeness of the playsets but partly due to the product and the film, I think).Shockwave wrote:The 2009 Trek line failed, not because it's "Star Trek" but because it was handled by Playmates. Who wouldn't know the proper way to handle a toy line if it bit them in the ass. Aside from having two separate figure sizes (both 3 3/4" and 6") they also fucked up by flooding the toy aisles with everything. Then they also fucked up by having the completeness of the playsets be dependant on owning ALL of the figures and then not releasing the second wave. They honestly had their heads so far up their asses on that one that they were doing dental work. So it'll be interesting to see how Hasbro handles this.
The popcorn test was part of the appraisal inspection. They also tested for mold and other pests and what have you.
On the popcorn: Ah yes, ok, that makes more sense, my mom did that appraisal test on a condo she was trying to buy but it didn't have popcorn ceiling so I didn't realize that'd be included. That's cool.
Carl? That's a really weird one.


