What do you think about the Beast Hunters Prime news.

No noses? No problem! Zombiebots? Sure, why not. A confusing new canon that allows loose and contradictory material? And now a new sequel show with an entirely different art style that takes place way in the future!
User avatar
Onslaught Six
Supreme-Class
Posts: 7023
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 6:49 am
Location: In front of my computer.
Contact:

Re: What do you think about the Beast Hunters Prime news.

Post by Onslaught Six »

Shockwave wrote:
Sparky Prime wrote:
Shockwave wrote:-Is not Sparky.
What are you talking about?
It's a public reply to a very underhanded private message I got from Tigermegs ordering me to stop "flame baiting" him and trolling his threads. He also now believes that you and I are the same person using different usernames specifically for the purpose of trolling him :roll: The guy's nuts, I've blocked him and put all of his future PMs on autodelete.
This is not the first time he's done things like this. He has a long history of it on ATT.

You should probably forward those PMs to JT.
BWprowl wrote:The internet having this many different words to describe nerdy folks is akin to the whole eskimos/ice situation, I would presume.
People spend so much time worrying about whether a figure is "mint" or not that they never stop to consider other flavours.
Image
User avatar
Tigermegatron
Supreme-Class
Posts: 2106
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:28 am

Re: What do you think about the Beast Hunters Prime news.

Post by Tigermegatron »

Shockwave wrote:
Sparky Prime wrote:
Shockwave wrote:-Is not Sparky.
What are you talking about?
It's a public reply to a very underhanded private message I got from Tigermegs ordering me to stop "flame baiting" him and trolling his threads. He also now believes that you and I are the same person using different usernames specifically for the purpose of trolling him :roll: The guy's nuts, I've blocked him and put all of his future PMs on autodelete. I don't have enough spare time to waste on making someone's life on the internet difficult and why he would be arrogant enough to think that someone would waste their time doing so is beyond me. I mean, seriously, I don't have that kind of time on my hands for one and for two I don't give enough of a shit to go through all that effort.

Besides, lol, if he actually went back read some of our previous arguments, he'd realize pretty quickly that we're obviously not the same person. The AHM thread alone should prove that, not to mention that most of that happened long before he joined our site. Seriously, I have to wonder what goes on in his head. The guy definitely lives in his own paranoid little world of crazy.

The underhanded part of his approach is that he sent me the PM and disabled the ability to reply to it, effectively throwing out wild accusations with no chance to defend myself. I guess some people are so afraid of the truth that they don't even want to hear it.
How ironic,the flame baiter tries to act like the victim instead of Acknowledging he was the troble maker/flame baiter.

I got sick & tired of all the childish & tag teaming flame baiting games that were being played on me by sparky & shockwave. So I Sent them "ONE", POLITE PM EACH ASKING THEM TO STOP THE FLAME BAITING". In that one PM I sent them I informed both of them that I put them on my ignore/foe list.

I did nothing WRONG by sending a PM to Shockwave. this PM option is available to all members here. only a rude flame baiter would make a big deal & fuss about getting a PM from another member. The PM I sent was polite & asking for the guy to stop flame baiting me on the forums

I don't come here to get flame baited by agnry TF fans. I come here to discuss the TF topics in polite & non-flame baiting ways.

Contrary to popular belief it is not wrong for members to PM each other. As long as the PM is polite & only one PM is sent to that member. This is why most forums have the PM option. it's so members can discuss things in a polite manner,not disrupting the flow of the message forums. The one "PM" sent to Shockwave was very polite & respectfully done. IMHO,Only a flamebaiter/troble maker would take offense & make a big deal about getting a polite PM from another member asking him politely to stop the rude & flame baiting behavior.
Last edited by Tigermegatron on Sat Mar 02, 2013 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Gomess
Supreme-Class
Posts: 2767
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 1:10 am
Location: Eng-er-land

Re: What do you think about the Beast Hunters Prime news.

Post by Gomess »

So did you really make the PM in question unrepliable?
COME TO TFVIEWS oh you already did
User avatar
Tigermegatron
Supreme-Class
Posts: 2106
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:28 am

Re: What do you think about the Beast Hunters Prime news.

Post by Tigermegatron »

Gomess wrote:So did you really make the PM in question unrepliable?
It doesn't matter what shockwave did to his PM Options. Because I only intended to send him that one PM. I had no intent on over-abusing the PM option. I had no intent on sending shockwave more than ONE PM.

I did nothing wrong by sending Shockwave that PM. Because sending members PM's are not against the rules here. My PM was polite & asking for the flame baiting attacks to stop towards me.

IMHO,Only a trouble maker/flame baiter would make a big deal/fuss & announce he got a polite PM from another member here.

only in the on-line fandom,Does the trouble maker/flame baiter try to act like the victim instead of the attacker.

I've added Shockwave to my ignore/foe list,So I can no longer see his trouble making & rude flame baiting attacks toward me.
User avatar
Gomess
Supreme-Class
Posts: 2767
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 1:10 am
Location: Eng-er-land

Re: What do you think about the Beast Hunters Prime news.

Post by Gomess »

He accused you of making the message unrepliable. So, did you?

'Cos the thing is, you're accusing Shockwave of flamebaiting. I for one have seen no evidence of this. His accusation toward you, on the other hand, is still waaay unresolved.

I'm sure you appreciate that I'm trying to be fair, here. Not much on this board annoys me, but tossing around words like "flamebaiting" so casually will probably do the trick.
COME TO TFVIEWS oh you already did
User avatar
Tigermegatron
Supreme-Class
Posts: 2106
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:28 am

Re: What do you think about the Beast Hunters Prime news.

Post by Tigermegatron »

Gomess wrote:He accused you of making the message unrepliable. So, did you?

'Cos the thing is, you're accusing Shockwave of flamebaiting. I for one have seen no evidence of this. His accusation toward you, on the other hand, is still waaay unresolved.

I'm sure you appreciate that I'm trying to be fair, here. Not much on this board annoys me, but tossing around words like "flamebaiting" so casually will probably do the trick.
I didn't make the PM message un-repliable.

in a minute i will be adding shockwave to my foe/ignore list. so I'm guessing he will no longer be able to send me any PM's from this point onwards.
Last edited by Tigermegatron on Sat Mar 02, 2013 3:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Gomess
Supreme-Class
Posts: 2767
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 1:10 am
Location: Eng-er-land

Re: What do you think about the Beast Hunters Prime news.

Post by Gomess »

Alright then, thanks for finally answering! So, since we have two conflicting accounts of what happened it's really down to JT to sort out, if he feels it's worth the effort.

Sigh. Breakups are always hard.
COME TO TFVIEWS oh you already did
User avatar
Onslaught Six
Supreme-Class
Posts: 7023
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 6:49 am
Location: In front of my computer.
Contact:

Re: What do you think about the Beast Hunters Prime news.

Post by Onslaught Six »

hahahahaha oh god my spine
BWprowl wrote:The internet having this many different words to describe nerdy folks is akin to the whole eskimos/ice situation, I would presume.
People spend so much time worrying about whether a figure is "mint" or not that they never stop to consider other flavours.
Image
User avatar
Gomess
Supreme-Class
Posts: 2767
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 1:10 am
Location: Eng-er-land

Re: What do you think about the Beast Hunters Prime news.

Post by Gomess »

See, now you've hurt O6 too.

These things cut both ways.
COME TO TFVIEWS oh you already did
User avatar
JediTricks
Site Admin
Posts: 3851
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:17 pm
Location: LA, CA, USA

Re: What do you think about the Beast Hunters Prime news.

Post by JediTricks »

Shockwave wrote:We're never getting MP Magnus with any sort of armor. Ever. I've made my peace with that after MP-02 only came with a crappy cardboard trailer. As much as I would LOVE for this to happen, like I said, I've made peace with the fact that it never will.
You are most likely right, but you know what's dumb about that? They're putting out armor over and over in the Cyberverse line, we've got the Optimus armor and the Bumblebee armor and a repaint of the Bumblebee armor in Prime. Are they so lazy they can't just create something for Magnus as well? They even had trailers becoming armor suits in the DOTM Cyberverse line! Someone should repaint DOTM Optimus with flight trailer to be Ultra Magnus. DO IT NOW. ;)

Onslaught Six wrote:This is not the first time he's done things like this. He has a long history of it on ATT.

You should probably forward those PMs to JT.
Oh gee thanks. :p

Gomess wrote:Alright then, thanks for finally answering! So, since we have two conflicting accounts of what happened it's really down to JT to sort out, if he feels it's worth the effort.
It's not. What do you guys think we should do? We could let TM ignore Shockwave and Sparky, or we could... let TM ignore Shockwave and Sparky. I mean, seriously, we as a group usually make policy decisions but in this case, what's really the policy, and what's the crime? I don't think Sparky or Shockwave are trolling so there's no discipline I see necessary there, and TM isn't calling them out publicly (at least not before it got brought up more publicly by others in this thread first) so there's no discipline action needed there either.
Sigh. Breakups are always hard.
Yet not so much in this case.
Image
See, that one's a camcorder, that one's a camera, that one's a phone, and they're doing "Speak no evil, See no evil, Hear no evil", get it?
Post Reply