Obviously there is a huge difference, but no matter how competent someone/something is, mistakes do happen, even with the best of things.
And, a large number of mistakes, (along with just plain bad writing), are reasonable grounds to say that a story is not the "best of things".
Nobody is denying that mistakes happen. But, how many really stupid mistakes does it take to diminish something? How much praise can you heap on something with as much "room for improvement" as RotF has?
I have noticed that the entertainment defense is used to defend some of the most incompetently written/told stories, which tend to have basis for a legitimate defense otherwise. The entertainment defense is pretty much saying that having any expectation of competence, or even (*gasp*) some intelligence, is unreasonable.
Yet McCarthy himself had said the pacing was where he wanted it, even with the 12 issues arrangement. And I don't see that McCarthy really had anything more to say than "look at how kewl the Decepticons are rampaging Earth with out the Autobots". The focus of this "full" story should have been on some of the points it brings up, but sadly falls very far short. Despite it's own problems, ROTF I'd say is a better story.
The problem with the pacing was that McCarthy was writing for the trade. This is common. And, it is even understandable. (As McCarthy said, he wants to look back on it as a complete story, rather than just saying how good one issue was.)
I have written at length about the ideas in AHM. I have no frame of reference for illustrating them further. On the other hand, McCarthy is hardly writing about anything terribly obscure. Most people are at least familiar with basic concepts like leadership or organizational behavior, even if they do not use those specific terms. I am not seeing any real ideas in RotF, let alone any ideas handled well.
They needed a big open air field with a bunch of old planes to talk to Jetfire in, so they made it happen.
Are you saying that we should assume that the Smithsonian in context with RotF has a storage yard behind it, or that "it is okay because the writers needed the characters to magically appear in another region so they made the characters just appear magically in another region because they needed it to happen"?
I know, older post, but I'm trudging back through the thread and thought I'd mention this--why does everyone assume that that scene takes place locally? We have no idea where that graveyard is. At the time, Prime and the others were still on the west coast (I'm assuming?) while Sam was on the east. There's no reason to assume that Bumblebee didn't drive out several hours to meet Prime halfway somewhere.
A cross country drive would take more than a few hours. Time and distance in Bay's movies are very fluid, and it leads to weird inconsistencies like this. Based on dialogue from Leo about only being in college for two days, BB and Sam's round trip could not have been that long, even if BB gave the ungrateful twerp a ride home. And, is Prime really going to drag somebody too far out of their way to ask a favor of them? (Well, maybe Optimus jerk from the movie, but.....)
Dom
-finally gets back here after a week.