Dominic wrote:Not a fan of the Thrawn series. It had too many contrivances for my liking. ("While running from the Empire, Luke finds himself captured by pirates. Hilarity ensues when the same Imperials that were chasing Luke stop by the pirates' hideout to solicit a bribe. Things get even crazier when one of the pirates turns out to be an assassin whose sole purpose in life is to kill Luke! Can Luke Skywalker get out of this one, maybe with a little help from the force?")
Luke was a pretty big deal, it wasn't terribly surprising that he'd eventually come across people who wanted to kill him after ROTJ. And Thrawn's Imperial forces didn't randomly come across Karde and his crew, they were HUNTING LUKE SKYWALKER and it led them to that sector. That's not coincidence, that's linear. As for Mara Jade, tracking down enemy-of-her-boss Luke Skywalker was one of the things she had to do, it wasn't her sole purpose. I eyeroll in your general direction.
Here's the thing, this show doesn't feel anything like the post-Ep 3 content out there to me, this feels entirely different and thank goodness for that. This is as unlike Quinlan Vos' survival as it gets in tone, although I suppose on the surface there are similarities.
There is no way to know until "Rebels" ends.
Really, you can't just take it from the way he's presented when we meet him, you have to be entirely sure his whole arc plays out differently first? I'm gauging the character based on the movie, an episode, AND A NOVEL, and I'm telling you that it's not that similar in tone - instead of waiting to see if they bend him to that, despite no evidence they will and an entirely different storytelling staff, you could look into it yourself... or you could just make a snap judgement based on no direct knowledge.
But, SW no longer has the credibility needed for me to stick around and find out. If nothing else, if Dark Horse (licensing from Lucas Film) was not going to kill Vos (and actually had him survive in the stupidest way possible), then I have real doubts that any of the main characters in "Rebels" (including a Jedi?!?!?) are going to be killed off before Episode 4 "happens".
You mean the same Dark Horse that isn't involved with Star Wars storytelling anymore, that Dark Horse? I assume that these characters won't die at the end of the series, that they won't succeed at being great Jedi because they're incomplete and they'll just drift off to an unimportant storytelling position in a different corner of the galaxy. Then again, they did just raise their visibility to the Empire quite a bit, maybe it'll conclude with Ezra or Kanan getting iced and the others carrying on in their name, fighting the good fight, making little dents and running little missions against the Empire.
"Dark Times" got it thematically right, even if they execution was off in places. Any Jedi that survived Order 66 (through luck or aggression) had 3 choices: -suicidal last stand, guerilla tactics or just quitting. The first two options obligate the character to die.
Quit is what Kanan did, until he found something worth trying again. A New Dawn makes a big point of his mindset earlier in his life about this, how he's not ready to pull the lightsaber out of the pouch and reassemble it yet, and he tries to hide his abilities at all costs.
I got in to Ostrander's run on "Star Wars" with the assumption that the books had a sunset provision (Episode III) and that most of the characters were going to die. The only main character from Ostrander's run (as "main" as a character from a tie-in book can be) to die was Secura. And, *that* was only because she died on-screen in the movie. As soon as I saw that Vos' death got cut from the movie, I started worrying that Dark Horse would back-pedal.
You do know Vos was in Episode I as a background nothing and they just co-opted him into the stories, right? So um, yeah, not exactly earning huge points there either.
The fact that Tano survived "Clone Wars" at all makes me doubt that Disney will let "Rebels" end correctly.
Disney had nothing to do with that decision.
BWprowl wrote:I saw the preview for this a couple weeks back and was amazed at how bad I thought it looked. Everything looks so painfully generic and by-the-book and safe. I especially love our scrappy everyboy hero who's not destined for greatness at all.
"Who is that kid?!"
"What happened out there?" "He did."
Seriously? It oughta be illegal to write lines like that in this day and age.
Really though, "teenage girl graffiti artist Mandalorian" is where I had to draw the line and say "I'm done".
Oh, I get it! When Obi-Wan's recording mentions 'A New Hope', that's THE NAME OF THE MOVIE! Four stars, cartoon of the year.
Thanks for the douchiest, most surface way of looking at it. You are entitled to judge based on the smallest amount of information possible, but holy crap did you take that entitlement seriously and use it to shit on everything I said. For someone who constantly bemoans the lack of new things, maybe the problem isn't the new things you come across, perhaps the issue is that you are looking for something you haven't seen yet while ignoring that virtually nothing in life is created in a vacuum, whole-cloth.
Ezra is a bit of a twat, he's not destined for greatness, we in fact know he's going to flame out because we don't hear his name in the movies so Filoni has to rectify the existence of the character with pre-existing material, it's one of his directives.
Star Wars has always had corny dialogue, but the fact that you pulled one line out of context and then shit on it and held that snark up as evidence that the storytelling is bad, that's lazy criticism. And Star Wars has always had repeating dialogue and touches, that's not something new.
There was nothing offensive about Sabine aside from "girl in Mando armor" teen fanwank, but guess what, you put almost anything from Star Wars in here and it'll come off as pandering because Star Wars casts a wide net, it has significant reach. So they're trying to appeal to a younger audience, but there's an actual character in there beyond just a simple gimmick, which you don't care about since you made your snap judgement.
Just wait until you meet the grizzled, sarcastic smuggler with a heart of gold and the spunky Astromech droid with major 'tude!
2 of my favorite characters, but at least you got to feel like a big shot by breaking it down to the shallowest level. Never mind that Chopper the cobbled-together astromech is the willful housecat to R2-D2's faithful dog. Never mind that Kanan isn't a smuggler and isn't that grizzled and is carrying an emotional darkness which may swallow him up as he struggles to care about something bigger than himself. They are easily pigeonholed to justify your pre-opinion, so let's spread that on toast!
Tigermegatron wrote:I saw and didn't like the SW episodes I,II & III,Theatre movies. I could never watch the newer SW cartoons that takes place in the Episodes I,II & III era. As it returns me to the mediocre terrible settings of the prequels.
This isn't prequel-era.
Dominic wrote:Just watched the trailer and the preview.
The music in the preview is like cargo-cult Williams. (Seriously. Why the hell does the music have to be a watered down variant of the movie soundrack, rather than something stylistically similar but otherwise new?)
Gee, I dunno, because that music has been out of Star Wars for 30 years and needs to return to grab audiences, to help set the tone of something new? Williams' prequel scores are all "new" and they're all off-base, the second and third prequel actually sound grotesquely like Harry Potter films.
The trailer was cringe-inducing. Awfult Lucas dialogue instead of using visuals to economically convey story information? Yup. Focus grouped characters? Yup. Obligatory appearance by movie characters (R2D2 and C3PO)? Yup.
You watched the trailer or the preview? The preview has no R2 and 3PO. There is no dialogue written by Lucas for these, this is the first non-Lucas created Star Wars screen media ever, essentially. But yeah, it will sound similar to Star Wars, that's how it fucking goes when you're a spin off of Star Wars. And you watched a TRAILER, of course there was no time to "economically convey story information", there was no story to tell, it's a trailer. The characters may be meant to appeal to a wider audience, although it seems odd to claim that when the characters are targeting SPECIFIC groups, but they were created by the Star Wars storygroup and Filoni, Kinberg, Greg Weisman, not a focus group.
Ya gotta love how "Rebels" takes a scene that was cut from Episode III (Luminara's death during the Order-66 montage) and makes it a plot-point. Because, apparently, if a Jedi did not die on screen, they did not die. I can see a few getting away (mostly through luck), but the survival rate (especially for named minor characters) just keeps going up.
Watch the episode before you jack yourself all the way off with that self-congratulation.
Almighty Unicron wrote:To be perfectly fair, it logically follows that jedi should be hard to kill.
Huh, that's a funny thought, mystical wizard warrior monks are hard to kill, who'da thunk?