You mean IF they make the Dinobots combiners. I highly doubt that they will. Those characters have always been bad-ass enough on their own, and attempts to make them combiners in the past... Well they haven't gone well to say the least.Tigermegatron wrote:Those who dis-like Dinobots combiners toys can PRETEND they don't combine & play with them as regular toys.
Transformers - Age of Extinction
- Sparky Prime
- Supreme-Class
- Posts: 5225
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:12 am
Re: Transformers - Age of Extinction
- Onslaught Six
- Supreme-Class
- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 6:49 am
- Location: In front of my computer.
- Contact:
Re: Transformers - Age of Extinction
And IF the toys can actually all combine. Do I even need to bring up the ROTF Constructicon fiasco?You mean IF they make the Dinobots combiners.
- Tigermegatron
- Supreme-Class
- Posts: 2106
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:28 am
Re: Transformers - Age of Extinction
Ultimate/Supreme toys have a Bad tracking record of being more awful than decent,As Hasbro goes out of their way to aim this huge size class towards the much younger kids/toddlers. Because Hasbro estimates this will be the gigantic TF toy gift young kids/toddlers receive from their parents for Christmas time.Onslaught Six wrote:And IF the toys can actually all combine. Do I even need to bring up the ROTF Constructicon fiasco?You mean IF they make the Dinobots combiners.
The Reason why the ROTF Supreme/ultimate sized Devasator had no individual robot modes for the constructicons was because to make it easier/simplier for younger kids/toddlers to play with this toy back & forth. ----> THE BLAME FALLS ON THE SUPREME/ULTIMATE size class.
Hasbro/Takara can create complex combiners for the Movie-verse toy line. If theirs Five TF4 Stunticons,if their all sold as seperate non-gift set toys,they can be complex toys. like having 4 deluxe size stunticons & one voyager motormaster that merge to form Menasor. or having 4 dinobots deluxes & one Voyager Grimlock that merge to form a gestalt.
- Tigermegatron
- Supreme-Class
- Posts: 2106
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:28 am
Re: Transformers - Age of Extinction
Was it really necessary to repeat shockwave's words over again via your reply? was this done to be annoying? I already answered this question via a reply in this thread. I refuse to get into a reply debate with you that spans pages in a thread rehashing the same exact point over & over.Sparky Prime wrote:You mean IF they make the Dinobots combiners. I highly doubt that they will. Those characters have always been bad-ass enough on their own, and attempts to make them combiners in the past... Well they haven't gone well to say the least.Tigermegatron wrote:Those who dis-like Dinobots combiners toys can PRETEND they don't combine & play with them as regular toys.
- Sparky Prime
- Supreme-Class
- Posts: 5225
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:12 am
Re: Transformers - Age of Extinction
Or how about the Arcee sisters? The deluxe figures have a combiner gimmick built into them but the instructions don't mention it and I've heard Elita-1 was supposed to have a unique mold to complete the form but instead was released as a redeco of Chromia.Onslaught Six wrote:And IF the toys can actually all combine. Do I even need to bring up the ROTF Constructicon fiasco?
I wasn't aware I was repeating anything. I was merely pointing out your response was implying the Dinobots will combine (which is way too early to know one way or another), and expressing my own opinion about it. It just happened to be somewhat similar to Shockwave's comments. Chill out, those debates are usually caused by your over reaction or misunderstanding, like this is.Tigermegatron wrote:Was it really necessary to repeat shockwave's words over again via your reply? was this done to be annoying? I already answered this question via a reply in this thread. I refuse to get into a reply debate with you that spans pages in a thread rehashing the same exact point over & over.
- Tigermegatron
- Supreme-Class
- Posts: 2106
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:28 am
Re: Transformers - Age of Extinction
No,your known for this sort of replying style here,with all the members here not just me. where you like to constantly keep repeating the same point over & over again, which drags on for pages in a thread.Sparky Prime wrote:Or how about the Arcee sisters? The deluxe figures have a combiner gimmick built into them but the instructions don't mention it and I've heard Elita-1 was supposed to have a unique mold to complete the form but instead was released as a redeco of Chromia.Onslaught Six wrote:And IF the toys can actually all combine. Do I even need to bring up the ROTF Constructicon fiasco?
I wasn't aware I was repeating anything. I was merely pointing out your response was implying the Dinobots will combine (which is way too early to know one way or another), and expressing my own opinion about it. It just happened to be somewhat similar to Shockwave's comments. Chill out, those debates are usually caused by your over reaction or misunderstanding, like this is.Tigermegatron wrote:Was it really necessary to repeat shockwave's words over again via your reply? was this done to be annoying? I already answered this question via a reply in this thread. I refuse to get into a reply debate with you that spans pages in a thread rehashing the same exact point over & over.
Last edited by Tigermegatron on Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Sparky Prime
- Supreme-Class
- Posts: 5225
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:12 am
Re: Transformers - Age of Extinction
You mean like you're doing right now? Yeah, no, that's not what I do. If I repeat myself, it's only because my point was ignored or misunderstood, to which I'm trying to clarify my meaning. I don't just keep repeating the same thing over and over again. You seem to have a habit of taking things the wrong way and then trying to pass blame onto others when they call you out on it. Just chill out and move on, there is no reason for this to be dragged out more than it already has.Tigermegatron wrote:No,your known for this sort of replying style here. where you like to constantly keep repeating the same point over & over again,with all the members here. which drags on for pages in a thread.
- Tigermegatron
- Supreme-Class
- Posts: 2106
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:28 am
Re: Transformers - Age of Extinction
I refuse to stoop to your level,So back into the Ignore/foe list you go.Sparky Prime wrote:You mean like you're doing right now? Yeah, no, that's not what I do. If I repeat myself, it's only because my point was ignored or misunderstood, to which I'm trying to clarify my meaning. I don't just keep repeating the same thing over and over again. You seem to have a habit of taking things the wrong way and then trying to pass blame onto others when they call you out on it. Just chill out and move on, there is no reason for this to be dragged out more than it already has.Tigermegatron wrote:No,your known for this sort of replying style here. where you like to constantly keep repeating the same point over & over again,with all the members here. which drags on for pages in a thread.
- Sparky Prime
- Supreme-Class
- Posts: 5225
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:12 am
Re: Transformers - Age of Extinction
You're on a level all your own dude, and I don't think anyone comes close to it. Anyway, back on topic.... 5 melee weapons have been spotted as being a part of Age of Extinction. Some look like swords, others remind me of key blades from "Kingdom Hearts". They seem to be about human sized rather than Cybertronian sized though, as Mark Wahlberg was spotted with one on set some time ago.
- Almighty Unicron
- Supreme-Class
- Posts: 452
- Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:25 pm
Re: Transformers - Age of Extinction
Can you guys please just ban this argumentative shit?